TV3 Wrong… AGAIN. Maybe I should just say still.

For those that were watching the little messages scrolling accross the screen this morning you would have seen that in Austalia the place where Ned Kelly died is being excavated.

Really?

No.

The place they are digging up is the site of the Glenrowan Inn where Kellys gang had themselves a bit of a shootout on the 28th June 1880. They fought the law and the law won. Kelly was taken, tried and hanged on the 11th November that year.

Neds remains were uncovered on the site of an abandoned prison along with the remains of 31 other excuted felons in March this year.

This information is freely available and took me 12 seconds to find (I’m not a fast typist), the only information I started with was knowing that Ned was hung not killed during the shootout. You evidently launched from fantasyland.

So TV3 are you confused over the excavation site or just plain bloody lazy? Are you a news source during what you have billed as your “news” or are you selling “fictional entertainment” inccorectly labeled? 

If I had the time and the will to check everything you tell would I find ANYTHING that was actualy accurate?

Production notes for TV3

Willie Apiata is NOT “New Zealands most decorated soldier”.

Stop just plucking random “sounds good” phrases out of your collective asses and do some basic research.

And decimation STILL means one in ten, not whatever you think it should mean at the time.

You people are amatures.

I agree, this is a travesty!

The Defence Force spent almost $35,000 on public relations advice - including news media training - for SAS soldier Willie Apiata to maximise coverage of him receiving the Victoria Cross, new figures reveal.

 Is that all? Get serious. the government will spend (aka piss away) half a mill on making parents feel good about themselves.

Seriously, 35K? Whats your fucking problem? Micky Sullens team just blew 4.3 bill. He screwed up on Kyoto by a couple of hundred mill in the wrong direction and you’re getting pissy about a man who won the VC?

Get over it.

Powerline Vs CBS V2.0 - David against Goliath

(Davids the one with the sniper rifle btw)

The story implicitly accused the career prosecutors who handled the case of complicity in the alleged conspiracy, but the real focus of CBS’s account was Karl Rove. The network’s star witness was a small-time Alabama lawyer named Jill Simpson, who claimed she was a life-long Republican, but had stepped forward to tell what she knew about events in 2001 and 2002.

You fools, you cannot take on The Rove and survive…

The alleged conversation described by Ms. Simpson has been denied by all of the alleged participants except Ms. Simpson. Indeed, even Mr. Siegelman states that Ms. Simpson’s affidavit is false as it relates to him. Moreover, according to Ms. Simpson, she met with Mr. Siegelman and his co-defendant Richard Scrushy for several months before signing the statement at their urging. She also claims to have provided legal advice to them. She contends she drafted but did not sign a motion filed by Mr. Scrushy seekung to have the federal judge removed from the case.

All of which is sheer madness. There are only two alternatives: either Ms. Simpson is a liar (or perhaps insane), or else every other person with knowledge of her allegations, including a former Alabama Supreme Court Justice and Don Siegelman himself, is lying. Yet CBS offered Ms. Simpson as a credible witness without disclosing these basic facts.

I’ll take A: Lying assed psyco-bitches with reality conectivity issues for 10 please Mathew.

So the question now is will CBS call in Harry Stamper for some good ol time deep core drilling or will you fold like the house of cards you are right now to minise the fallout?

What would be the worst [cough] Dan Rather [/gough] option?

Here’s a thought, maybe the prick was guilty. Just saying.

Anglosphere unites to oppose the UN!

With the notable exception of the mother country.

Mother….. country!

Lets take a look shall we, you know you want to.

The United Nations General Assembly has adopted a non-binding declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples after 22 years of debate.

So what I getting is that after 22 years of wank you have produced a meaningless document. Good work Untied Nations, it only takes a kiwi kid getting “defered success” on his NCEA report a couple of hours to do that. But good for you, well done. Here’s lollipop.

The document proposes protections for the human rights of native peoples, and for their land and resources.

Gosh exciting isn’t it readers. Just makes you want to go out and hug an Inuit right now doesn’t it and feel all warm and nobel about it without being in the least bit condescending either.

The General Assembly passed it, with 143 countries voting in favour and 11 abstaining.

Four nations - Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States - each with large indigenous populations, voted against.

Damn those evil evil white people again! Bastards!!!!

Of course Britain, the nation that hosts the parasite media organisation BBC who penned this news item I’m sourcing has a large indigenous population too. They are called English (or Anglish if you prefer) who have been there for at least 600 years longer than the first cheap plastic Taiwanese imported “indigenous” people first got blown ashore here. Recent indications are that Britain could well do with some afirmative action of its own to protect its indigenous peoples from the ravages of recent colonisation!

The bottom line here is the UN have attempted to have some of the worst violaters of human rights the planet has ever seen dicatate to those countries who have made efforts of their own to address their own situations while having their own ignored.

The Angloshpere cordialy invites the UN to cram it it up its multiculteral backside and get back to oppressing its own peoples.

Thank you for your interest.

Another proud kiwi moment.

As Helen Clark continues her hissy fit and infantile tantrum with a side order of toy throwing…

Prime Minister Helen Clark today took a retaliatory swipe at Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer over the troops’ flights row by bringing up his attendance at a National Party conference.

Miss Clark was asked by media this morning about Mr Downer speaking to New Zealand’s High Commissioner in Canberra last week over the Air New Zealand foreign policy blue.

The New Zealand Government reacted angrily last week to being kept in the dark by the airline and Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat) officials over the national carrier ferrying Australian troops from Darwin to Kuwait when some of them went on to Iraq.

The Australians have solved our problems for us by simply insitiuting their own policy of treating Air New Zealand like fresh dog shit on a hot day. They wouldn’t use Air NZ to fly plastic vomit out of Hong Kong.

Helen Clarks mouth just cost this country $18,000,000. Just peanuts on what shes managed in the past, ask Telecom.

Once again Helen Clarks drive for a headline has cost a New Zealand company business. Nice work mouthy. This from a PM how has more than once shot her mouth off about other peoples policies to the point where she has had to appologise and anyone familier with Clarkzilla knows what THAT takes.

Bottom line is that Air NZ DID advise the government, through the correct channels. the Ministry of Foriegn Affairs and Trade. You’ll note the clever word use by the media of claiming that “MFaT AND Air NZ” had failed to advise the government. A Minsitry IS the government. If they don’t bother to tell the minister or more likely he couldn’t take time out for his busy bauble chasing to read his bloody mail its not the airlines fault. Air NZ transports, - sorry, used to transport - Australian troops all over the place. We have put combat troops into Iraq (enginners are one teeth arms, ask them) so Air NZ had no reason to expect this incredible faux shock horror spittle fest from the ugly one.

Its bloody rich for her to be telling the Australian Foriegn Affairs Minister that he should keep his mouth shut about Australias foriegn affairs you’d think. Why don’t you tell American voters who to vote for again Helen because THAT worked out so well last time.

For people outside New Zealand this is what we call a Labour Party “Charm Offensive” just out of interest.

Anyone wondering why every week six hundred kiwis decide to become Aussies in fact if not in name?

You don’t tread on Supermans cape.

You don’t spit into the wind.

You DON’T try and stich up Betty Windsor.

You can carry on lying your asses off about Iraq, Iran the ME in general and how Islam is the relgion of pieces whatever. But when even Australia isn’t interested in becoming a republic there’s a line you don’t cross. Every time you do it makes the monarchy stronger.

Things that are not “news worthy” in New Zealand.

Ten New Zealanders have been awarded the Bronze Star and seven have been awarded the United States Army Commendation Medal in recognition of exemplary service in Afghanistan between 2004 and 2005

These awards were made 16th October 2006. While Phil Goff played up the “peace keeping” side of what kiwis do on these deployments last I note that the NZSAS didn’t do a lot of bridge building for their PUC.

Here’s what the local media had to say.

Shhh.

Go read.

This is the most lucid presentation of the situation with our media and the feminist driven hysteria we’re expected to accept as news these days while real issues are willfully ignored.

My (tin-foil hat) theory is that Rickards is a victim of a political witch hunt. Helen Clark wants him gone and her flunkies installed at National Headquarters. There are too many coincidences. First, commissioner Doone ‘relieved’ of his position. Following his successor’s reign, Howard Broad, who helped oversee the Peter Ellis sex debacle — where innocent women were charged with faux crimes — was made top cop. Meanwhile, Lyn Provost, a civil servant with NO experience, expertise or prior interest in policing, was reappointed assistant commissioner. During the Robinson/Broad/Provost era, some questionable plans have emerged from the commissioner’s office. These include:

1. Plans to share sensitive information with dubious agencies such as Women’s Refuge - a increasingly politicised body with a spurious anti-male agenda.
2. Plans to implement computer software to decide whether a reported crime warrants investigation, rather than relying on the judgement of individual officers. (Perhaps to massage crime numbers so as to reassure a nervous public? After all, a crime isn’t a ‘crime’ if it’s not recorded as such.
3. Plans to overhaul the Police Act. Most alarmingly, amendments to allow cops suspected of wrongdoing to be fired before proper employment/judicial proceedings have been finalised. This would neatly solve Helen Clark’s ‘Rickards problem’, or any cop deemed ‘problematic’ by future govt ministers.

Sue Bradford wouldn’t know democracy

if it smashed her in the nose or popped her at 500 meters with a .50 cal.

Sue Bradford wallows in the victim spot light. Thanks for that CYFS Watch you fuckwits.

“I’m hoping that the emotions that have been aroused will calm down as they realise that the democratic processes of this country need to take place and threatening to kill people is really anathema to democracy.”

DEMOCRACY????? You mean because a corrupt government who bought power with our money and has lost its paper thin majority to another corrupt member going down is so desperate to grasp onto to power that you can now hold them to ransom and pass quite possibly the most UNPOPULAR bill in our history that its democratic? And we’re expected to believe that all the labour MPs are voting their own beliefs when they lockstep to support this travesty? Hell most days we have trouble believing they even have their own beliefs let alone the courage to support them.

What.colour.is.the.sky.in.your.world?

“If that website could be closed down, that would be fantastic. It isn’t just about me.”

Yes its “fantastic” that you can utterly smash free speech of voters because they fucked up in the fine print while you’re part of a government that hides behind parliamentary privilege to attack and vilify a religious group going as far as calling for their removal from the country. What a “tolerant” vocalisation from someone who should know better then abusing people for not being exactly mainstream George.

“Some of the parents who want to defend the parents right to hit their kids seem quite fanatical and I think this threat against me is the latest manifestation.”

If by some you mean virtually ALL OF THEM then yes. However when it comes to being the fanatic lets take a look at YOU. With near pathologically tunnel vision you have pursued this bill ignoring facts, altering facts and outright lying to bull it through. The language you have used is telling. Look at that comment alone. ” the parents right to hit their kids”. As always you use the most violent and emotive of language to play up to you audience.

You claimed that the police will use “common sense” in interpretation yet the police have already contradicted this. Yet you choose to ignore them. Outright deception on your part.

If you want to see a fanatic, get a mirror lady.

You’re a communist trying to force your way into the homes of good decent kiwis and impose your socialist agenda on them. You will make criminals of honest people and you will not save ONE SINGLE CHILD.

You are doing this against the wishes of a huge majority of voters. You are the very definition of anti-Democratic.

If you are a parent and you want to retain the right to raise your own children then go to parliament tomorrow and say so. Don’t let Bradford speak for you. Take the kids and make a picnic of it.

Please do not assassinate Sue Bradford or any other MPs while you are there. Thank you.