Question for today.

What was a gay activist website doing cruising the sites of young boys in the first place?

If Bill Englishs son is fair game for your attention then you are WIDE open to recieve ours!

You now have it.

UPDATE: For the hard of learning. This site does not exist for your free speech, it exists for mine. I do NOT host labour party sock puppetry so don’t bother. Any further comments from labour party afiliates and follwers will be removed without warning and may be result in action under the anti-spamming laws.

Advertisements

6 Responses to Question for today.

  1. james says:

    What was a gay activist website doing cruising the sites of young boys in the first place?

    well, the article you linked to says…

    “GayNZ said more offensive remarks had been posted, and it had been alerted by readers.”

    mystery solved?

  2. Lucyna says:

    So, what were the “readers” of GayNZ doing cruising the sites of young boys in the first place?

  3. Murray says:

    James you seem to have gotten lost, we don’t give free reign to smart arse left wing arseholes here. As any fool with an elementary command of English can see the article makes it clear that they went hunting and are now trying to add to it after having directed their own readers to the childs site.

    I no more approve of this behaviour than I would of heterosexual males of the age of David Benson-Pope stalking 14 year old girls on line.

    The gays want the spot light on them, we they fucking have it. No theyw explain their questionable behaviour. vanything other than cheap political hakery and victim industry bullshit wont sail.

    Don’t bother coming back, you have TV1 to be you left wing sock puppet.

  4. james says:

    “James you seem to have gotten lost, we don’t give free reign to smart arse left wing arseholes here. ”

    well, good on you.

    “As any fool with an elementary command of English can see the article makes it clear that they went hunting and are now trying to add to it after having directed their own readers to the childs site.”

    That’s irrelevant to the question you asked, which was…

    “What was a gay activist website doing cruising the sites of young boys IN THE FIRST PLACE?”

    They were alerted – as I pointed out – by readers (presumably, as lucyna suggests, gay bebo users whose networks intersect with those of the young Mr Key), and from there, they went on their ‘hunt’. It doesn’t change the fact that IN THE FIRST PLACE they were there because someone had pointed them in that direction. I wasn’t actually aware of the furore at all until I read your post, so I’m quite willing to accept your assertions that the whole thing is a trumped up witch-hunt. It probably is.

    But both you and lucyna seem to think that bebo users and gay people are mutually exclusive? Should members of gaynz not be allowed to join social networking sites?

    “Don’t bother coming back, you have TV1 to be you left wing sock puppet.”

    Crikey – you try and help a guy out by answering his question, and he calls you an arsehole and wants to banish you from his site! And I don’t own even own a TV!

  5. krm says:

    Alright lefties, which is it? Is gay OK or not? If it is OK, why is it a problem to call someone who is gay that? Is it the use of the term “fag”? They use the term, it is in pretty common useage among the teen age set. What the hell is the issue here?

  6. Murray says:

    James having already been banned should be you glue to fuck off. Changing your details doesn’t change your IP and having already been bitch slapped to hell and back for your sock puppetry the rest of us would have thought you might have retained the lesson.

    Evidently not.

    You comment is quite simply a lie which is the party line you trying to circulate. The site trolled the boys site in an effort to smear his father, this they have already admitted to. They then tried to play the game of saying it wasn’t them it was their readers who alerted them. This is a big fat hairy pile of crap and wont wash.

    You play the victim card yourself by being a whiny assed little bitch claiming you were just trying help. You just trying to help consists of party approved talking points and this site does not play host to socialist sock puppets.

    And as you are well aware there is near universal condemnation of this attacking a politician through his child. So keep your hackery and psycophantic trolling elsewhere.

    I restate, there are serious questions to be addressed about adult gay men cyber stalking and child. You no longer get to play red herring ranger on my site. Any further comments from you will be regarded as spam and brought to the attention of you internet service provider. Shit those anti-spam laws don’t look that good all of sudden do they.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: