Help with language definition to cover the new laws.

#1 Repeal of Section the Use of Reasonable Force. Or making what is reasonable illegal to criminalise those acting reasonably. 

Ok there seems to be a deliberate attempt to redefine a “smack” as a “beating”.

This ham fisted attempt at nurolinguistic programming by the left has led to people (85% at last count) being labeled as “pro-beating” by leftist hacks and Mike Moreu (who is possibly a subset of group A anyway).

To claim back our languge and provide a guidline for those who may be confused please apply the floowing principle:

1. A smack as an “acceptble spank” would be want you want to do with Haley Westenra. 

2. A smack which would be “acceptable thrashing” would be what you want to do to Sue Bradford.

Use it in good health and send the abuse, threats, and hatemail to the usual address: 

Wait did I mean unacceptable there? Meh who can say, we’ll just legalise it with retrospective legislation after the election. As Helen said, retrospective legislation is ALWAYS an option.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: